Sigma 150 600mm nikon fit professional#

Dust- and splash-proof to facilitate photography in the field and featuring a detachable tripod socket for more convenient handheld photography, this lens is a lightweight high-performance model offering outstanding usability. An issue for hyper-telephoto lenses in particular at the telephoto end, optical aberrations have been minimise d throughout the zoom range. It has put a special emphasis on its optical performance by incorporation of 1 FLD and 3 SLD glass elements, optimization of lens power distribution and minimise d chromatic aberration of magnification. On the other hand, that of the SIGMA 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM | Contemporary is to achieve a lightweight and compact construction for higher usability with similar specifications.

Sigma 150 600mm nikon fit professional#

On the one hand, the product concept of the SIGMA 150-600mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM | Sports is to achieve the best optical and action-capture performance to meet the requirements of professional photographers. The first hyper-telephoto zoom lens from our Contemporary line for better usability. The same focal ranges for different purposes. at 500mm with the 200-500, something I would never be able to do with the Sigma given its weight and seemingly lesser image stabilization.A lightweight hyper-telephoto zoom lens featuring high usability and outstanding optical performance. I've gotten sharp images hand held down to 1/30 sec. I, for one, rarely use a tripod or monopod which made the 200-500 choice a no-brainer for me. Designed and executed for the most demanding types of photography, the Sigma 150-600mm 5-6.3 DG HSM OS Sports lens is the new standard for telephoto zooms.

The Sigma has sharper corners at 150mm and 500mm, but the Tamron has sharper corners at 400mm. Stopping down to f/8 reduces most of the sharpness advantages one lens has over the other. Wide open sharpness is excellent with both lenses, and I think the decision should ultimately come down to whether or not you think you need that extra 100mm, or if you hand hold your lenses for a significant amount of time. At 600mm, the Tamron has a very slight center-of-the-frame advantage and the Sigma has a larger corner-of-the-frame advantage. That being said, I ended up with the 200-500 for a few reasons: faster aperture, significantly less vignetting wide open, much lighter (I can hand hold it significantly longer than the 150-600 S), better image stabilization, and better bokeh. Both lenses have some copy variation and could leave a bad taste in your mouth if you end up with a bad copy. One thing you'll want to check from the very beginning is making sure you have as sharp copy wide open at maximum focal length. I have owned both and ended up with the 200-500. If I could only have one lens then I would probably have the 200-500! Hood does not fit well and comes away easilyīuilt like a tank (but also a disadvantage) I did buy it to use with the D500 but returned it as a lot of images (more than I expected) were borderline 'soft'. I would steer clear of the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary as it is quite soft at the longer end.

It does lose out to the Sigma at both near and far, so I believe that the Sigma is more flexibleĪ UK magazine has just votes the 150-600 sport as the best zoom lens against the Nikon, Sigma Contemprary and Tamron equivalents. Also constant 5.6 throughout the range and can take a teleconverter. The Nikon 200-500 is good value and can be handheld for most of the time. I also have the much heavier Sigma 150-600 Sport which is currently in Japan, where Sigma are changing the camera mount from Canon to Nikon and I think when it is returned will be my first choice with a monopod, as it is too heavy for me to hand hold for long periods. I have the Nikon 200-500 paired with a D500 and have been happy with the results.

My main uses for these lenses are for motorsport and air displays. I own the Nikon 200-500 and the Sigma 150-600 Sport and have tried the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary lens. What is your main use for this lens? What is your budget as options 2 & 3 are almost twice the price of 1.